We’ve had some amazingly good weather in the Northeast for the past several days contrasting the national US housing market.

One the things I keep asking myself is: Why does conventional wisdom keep painting a rosy picture of the US economy, including worries about inflation, while housing is weak and getting weaker.

Here are today’s NAR stats (sorry to non-WSJ subscribers, but a bunch of links there today):

>Existing-home sales dipped during May to their lowest level in nearly four years, while inventories climbed and prices fell a 10th straight time.

>Home resales fell to a 5.99 million annual rate, a 0.3% decrease from April’s revised 6.01 million annual pace, the National Association of Realtors said Monday. April’s rate was originally estimated at 5.99 million.

>The median home price was $223,700 in May, down 2.1% from $228,500 in May 2006. The median price in April this year was $219,800. The 2.1% drop marked the 10th consecutive year-over-year price decline.

Many foreign economies are getting overheated and their central banks are taking action to cool things off. One of the reasons the stock market has done well, despite housing’s weaknesses, has been the weak dollar and the resulting boost in corporate profits.

>What does this all mean for stocks? Corporate profits have benefited from strength overseas and the weak dollar — one reason why stocks have been able to fly through the housing turbulence largely unscathed. The Dow industrials are up 7.2% so far this year, despite Friday’s selloff.

I have always pictured the Federal Reserve as having a laser-like focus on inflation, perhaps even with blinders on. That’s what they talk about, fret about, worry about and act upon. Consumers interpret them as being the captain of the ship, steering asset classes around trouble. However, the Fed seems less connected to asset class surges like stocks and housing of recent years and their causes. Limited oversight in lending activity, not just subprime is cause for concern. Consumers have been doing a lot of head scratching lately as to what the Fed is trying to achieve.

The US housing market has moved into slow burn mode, with declining sales activity, rising inventory and slipping prices. But more significantly, and perhaps most unexpectedly, the implosion of subprime and re-consideration of the entire mortgage process is getting worse.

As it turns out, all the hype about housing price bubbles has proved to be focused on the wrong thing. Rising housing prices in recent years are really more closely associated with easy credit. Easy mortgages (cheap and limited oversight) created the demand, which led to rising prices.

In past boom cycles like we saw in stocks and housing, (real) regulatory oversight proved difficult because the pace was so fast. Hence, the mortgage industry became the wild west.

Now we have Wall Street licking its subprimal wounds and they are expect to get bigger. Recent troubles with hedge funds and subprime make the point. There was little understanding of risk (does this sound familiar?). Subprime mortgages as a key issue doesn’t seem to be going away and I suspect we are at the tip of the iceberg, with a lot more mortgage problems to be revealed in the near future.

Yet curiously, conventional wisdom is shouting an improving economy and a threat of inflation as evidenced by the rising 10-year treasuries. Foreigners wonder when the US is going to enter a recession while Americans worry that the economy is getting over heated. Strange.

Gasoline prices have been falling (didn’t the same thing happen last summer?), and every day reveals more problems with subprime lenders and how the Wall Street didn’t appreciate risks associated with them because — guess what — by not understanding the asset values (or taking them seriously), they didn’t understand (I repeat) the risks associated with them.

I suspect the subprime problem will continue to expand, further weakening the stock market. Rising mortgage rates will further weaken national housing market, and we will still be scratching our heads when the possibility of recession becomes even more real.

Of course, I can’t tell if the head scratching is attributable too much sun and not enough reality.

4 Comments

  1. Noah June 25, 2007 at 12:46 pm

    JM – getting into the predictions game, huh? “I suspect the subprime problem will continue to expand, further weakening the stock market. Rising mortgage rates will further weaken national housing market, and we will still be scratching our heads when the possibility of recession becomes even more real. “

    I love it! One thing to keep in mind. BLS data does have flaws and this world we live in is a global world, with STILL tons of liquidity. Global economies are growing very fast, much faster than us, and rates are rising to slow things down. We are playing catch up to make sure our US dollars don’t disintegrate into nothingness.

    The effects of globally higher rates will kick in, but we wont see it until another 2-3 years at the very least. Right now, we are STILL seeing global economies that are a result of ultra cheap money from years ago. It takes time to trickle down to the point where it stops the fast running freight train.

    Keep an eye on OIL for a forward looking indicator to see if global economies are starting to slow. Not only do geo-political and terrorist issues affect oil prices, but global supply and demand does as well. And demand is HIGH! Oil prices will fall if demand slows and that could be an indication the good times are nearing its peak. Just a thought for down the road.

  2. Jonathan J. Miller June 25, 2007 at 12:56 pm

    Thanks Noah. Great stuff! No not getting into that business…Not really predictions. More like contrarian observations 😉

  3. […] Inflating the Subprimal Roof (Matrix) […]

  4. WT Economist June 26, 2007 at 2:09 pm

    I agree with Noah. Inflation is a possibility due to raw materials shortages and growth overseas, and rate cuts could tank the dollar and send long term rates soaring.

    Recession is also a possibility.

    Staflation is also a possibility. It’s Goldilocks, but with thin gruel instead of porridge.

Comments are closed.